Monday, November 14, 2011
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Carlos Dávila, ¿Hay que pedir responsabilidades penales a Zapatero?
-
He leído que un premio Nobel de Economía pide directamente la cárcel para los ejecutivos que arruinen a sus empresas. He leído esta exigencia el mismo día en que la Unión Europea nos pegaba un palo de muerte y rebatía, una por una, las previsiones del Gobierno, cuya vicepresidenta –recuérdese– insistía la pasada semana en que España cumpliría su objetivo de déficit público, el 6%, tal y como habían sesudamente pronosticado los enormes especialistas del agónico Gobierno de Zapatero. Hilando las dos informaciones: la ocurrencia del citado Nobel y el desmentido de la UE a todos y cada uno de los estúpidamente optimistas pronósticos de este Ejecutivo que hemos venido padeciendo en España, el presente se preguntaba a lo peor con torcidas intenciones: vamos a ver, si para un gerente privado que en todo maneja fondos de la misma condición y que ha destrozado a su compañía, nada menos que un premio Nobel de Economía urge responsabilidades penales y, en su caso, el ingreso en prisión, ¿qué decir de un gobernante, en grado político de responsabilidad se entiende, que ha convertido a su país en un erial y que lo ha dejado en la práctica suspensión de pagos?
- Esto es lo que hayPor si alguien cree que afirmar que nuestra situación económica es trágica o caótica, quiero recoger aquí las opiniones que unos distinguidos técnicos de esta ciencia tan de plastilina como la economía sostienen ahora mismo sobre la susodicha situación. El pasado jueves, de campaña electoral en las islas Canarias, Mariano Rajoy alteró gran parte de su programa para ocuparse full time del momento que nuestro país está atravesando. Con certeza, el candidato popular conocía al dedillo las previsiones de la Unión Europea, y también –y esto resulta importante– las conversaciones extraoficiales que están manteniendo algunos responsables de su equipo económico con altos cargos del Gobierno de la Nación. El viernes publicábamos que estos administradores ya reconocen palmariamente que de la reducción del déficit nada y que, como escenario mejor, España tendrá este año un 7,5%; es decir, una auténtica catástrofe. Queda apenas una semana para que estos informadores gubernamentales de pacotilla, algunos ya colocados en los organismos reguladores con sueldos opíparos, se vayan con la música a otra parte, por utilizar una figura retórica no muy agresiva. La encuesta que insertamos hoy retrata lo que puede ser la fotografía del domingo que viene. Ya se sabe que en España una vetusta norma electoral impide que en estos días que quedan hasta el 20 se conozcan sondeos demoscópicos. Esta absurda regla lleva 34 años en vigor. Nosotros, en La Gaceta, hemos analizado la posibilidad de transgredir la norma, pero nos hemos quedado aterrorizados ante los efectos de la aventura: nada menos que la cárcel para este atrevido director. Por eso, la de hoy es nuestra aportación última a la prospectiva electoral. Es una muestra técnicamente impecable que puede acertar o fallar sólo en función de las inclinaciones de los electores. Ni nos hemos inventado la encuesta –un ejercicio que se está realizando impunemente en algún periódico nacional– ni hemos utilizado a empresas-fantasma para recoger nuestras apetencias. Como diría un castizo: señores, esto es lo que hay.Zapatero no respondeY, ¿qué hay? Pues de entrada, que no es poco, la posibilidad de quitarnos de encima esta pesadilla que atiende por Rodríguez Zapatero. La campaña, que ya está dando sus postreras bocanadas, nos ha traído una curiosa incidencia: la desaparición del presidente, del culpable de esta hecatombe. Es insólito y cobarde. Este político que ha emprendido la huida tiene ante los españoles la imprescindible obligación de decir qué es lo que ha hecho con nosotros, de responder de todas sus fechorías, de cargar con este gran desperfecto. No puede bastarnos con ese lagrimeo pueril de: “Yo soy el responsable”. Pues bien: como lo es, ¿sería mucho pedir que España entera le retire el apoyo al partido que ha consentido la presencia de un personaje tan incapaz, tan orate, tan sectario? Por ahí fuera –lo estamos constatando– ya proliferan los ejemplos: un primer ministro islandés está a punto de ingresar en la cárcel; Papandreu, el mentiroso que ha engañado a su país y a la Unión Europea, terminará pagando sus desmanes; y a Berlusconi, un sujeto que ha confundido a Italia entera con el Milan, se le abrirá más pronto que tarde alguna causa penal, y no sólo por sus devaneos erótico-festivos. Aquí, pues nada de nada. Aproximadamente el 22 de diciembre, fecha para la toma de posesión del nuevo Gobierno, el personaje tomará las de León y únicamente aparecerá por Madrid para cobrar como ¡consejero de Estado! ¿Consejero de Estado un individuo que lo ha roto y que lo ha puesto en la miseria? Esto es como si Artur Mas decide ser presidente de la Plaza Monumental de Barcelona, el coso taurino que se ha cargado con su voraz independentismo.Responsabilidad del presidenteA siete días de las elecciones –esperemos– del cambio, sorprende –la política nos hace cada día eternamente jóvenes– que tras la nueva argucia de ETA para demostrar que “estamos aquí, ojo, y que a nosotros no se nos torea”, este gobernante en extinción no ha dicho una palabra. Es todavía presidente y sabe mejor que nadie, quizá, eso sí, un poquito menos que Rubalcaba, qué es lo que se está gestando con ETA. Ayer lo denunciábamos muy claramente: lo que Zapatero ha hecho, en un ejercicio de felonía que debería dirimirse en los tribunales, es darle a ETA todo aquello por lo que los bandidos han venido asesinando en los últimos 50 años. Zapatero se marcha tarde y con el máximo daño posible. Si este país aún tuviera conciencia de tal, no soportaría que, quien ha presidido su Gobierno durante dos cuatrienios, huya como si aquí no hubiera pasado nada. La Constitución tiene 169 artículos y todos son igualmente válidos; pues bien, uno de ellos, el 102, se refiere precisamente a las actuaciones del máximo mandatario democrático del país y reza así: 1. “La responsabilidad criminal del Presidente y los demás miembros del Gobierno será exigible, en su caso, ante la Sala de lo Penal del Tribunal Supremo. 2. Si la acusación fuere por traición o por cualquier delito contra la seguridad del Estado en ejercicio de sus funciones, sólo podrá ser planteada por iniciativa de la cuarta parte de los miembros del Congreso, y con la aprobación de la mayoría absoluta del mismo”. Pues bien: ETA, Bildu, ya está en las instituciones; los presos se están acercando para que, llegado el momento ya con los etarras en el poder, todos salgan de las prisiones donde están siendo trasladados con el menor ruido posible; el Ejército es ya marginal, por no decir inexistente en el País Vasco; y Navarra está siendo acosada por los terroristas con la complacencia de un PSOE que probablemente el día 21 romperá su pacto con la Unión del Pueblo Navarro. Todo forma parte del volumen de exigencias que un día, hace muchos años, planteó con pistolas y bombas la archiconocida Alternativa KAS. Mil muertos después, Zapatero se ha rendido. ¿Cómo se llama constitucionalmente esa figura?
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Anthony de Mello. The way to love. Quotes IV
-Has it ever struck you that those who most fear to die are the ones who most fear to live?
-When you cling, you refuse to let go, you refuse to say goodbye, you resist death. And even though you may not realize it, that is when you resist life too. For life is on the move and you are stuck, life flows and you have become stagnant, life is flexible and free and you are rigid and frozen. Life carries all things away and you crave for stability and permanence. So you fear life and fear death because you cling.
-When you cling to nothing, when you have no fear of losing anything, then you are free to flow like the mountain stream that is always fresh and sparkling and alive.
-When you cling, you refuse to let go, you refuse to say goodbye, you resist death. And even though you may not realize it, that is when you resist life too. For life is on the move and you are stuck, life flows and you have become stagnant, life is flexible and free and you are rigid and frozen. Life carries all things away and you crave for stability and permanence. So you fear life and fear death because you cling.
-When you cling to nothing, when you have no fear of losing anything, then you are free to flow like the mountain stream that is always fresh and sparkling and alive.
Friday, October 28, 2011
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Perpetuidad
Sí, amo la vida... Dios... cómo la amo... estoy profunda y absolutamente enamorado de esta vida... el supremo regalo, la mayor de las bendiciones... ¿Paraísos? Los hay, existen... os lo garantizo... ¿Y lo mejor? Que depende de nosotros... siempre fue así... Los paraísos los construimos nosotros, cada segundo, cada momento que pasa, cada breve intervalo de milagros que se suceden continuamente a nuestro alrededor...
Una vida, convertida en lo que queramos... haciéndonos quienes somos acorde al reflejo de los espejos de nuestras ensoñaciones, ilusiones, gallardías... pero también miedos, inseguridades o excusas. Somos aquello en lo que creemos... somo aquello que nuestras acciones modelan...
¡Mira a tu alrededor! ¿Acaso el abrazo de la consciencia no te ha subyugado todavía? ¿No es suficiente la belleza de la estrella fugaz? ¿La humildad de un rocío que todo lo acaricia con sus suspiros de eternidad? ¿Aún no te diste cuenta de que este viaje es la más bonita de las metáforas del corazón?
Sí, estoy enamorado de esta bendita vida... tanto... tanto... un amor que me susurra y anima a abrir mis ojos, a dudar de las más arraigadas de mis certezas, a intentar comprender a los incomprendidos, a dar las gracias por el gris de las nubes, por la inmensa belleza de una recién estrenada mañana...
¿Y si fuésemos dioses? ¿Y si éste fuese el paraíso?
El viento confiesa que todo es posible mientras las notas de una canción nunca escuchada bailan muy pegadas con el silencio de quienes dejaron de soñar, abandonados a la traición de la rendición...
El supremo regalo nos ha sido entregado... Ahora es tu momento, nuestro momento... Son nuestros ahoras los que dibujan en continuo delirio los ecos de esta magnificencia perpetua que es la vida...
Una vida, convertida en lo que queramos... haciéndonos quienes somos acorde al reflejo de los espejos de nuestras ensoñaciones, ilusiones, gallardías... pero también miedos, inseguridades o excusas. Somos aquello en lo que creemos... somo aquello que nuestras acciones modelan...
¡Mira a tu alrededor! ¿Acaso el abrazo de la consciencia no te ha subyugado todavía? ¿No es suficiente la belleza de la estrella fugaz? ¿La humildad de un rocío que todo lo acaricia con sus suspiros de eternidad? ¿Aún no te diste cuenta de que este viaje es la más bonita de las metáforas del corazón?
Sí, estoy enamorado de esta bendita vida... tanto... tanto... un amor que me susurra y anima a abrir mis ojos, a dudar de las más arraigadas de mis certezas, a intentar comprender a los incomprendidos, a dar las gracias por el gris de las nubes, por la inmensa belleza de una recién estrenada mañana...
¿Y si fuésemos dioses? ¿Y si éste fuese el paraíso?
El viento confiesa que todo es posible mientras las notas de una canción nunca escuchada bailan muy pegadas con el silencio de quienes dejaron de soñar, abandonados a la traición de la rendición...
El supremo regalo nos ha sido entregado... Ahora es tu momento, nuestro momento... Son nuestros ahoras los que dibujan en continuo delirio los ecos de esta magnificencia perpetua que es la vida...
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Jorge Puyó Navarro. Biografía
(Ansó, H., 1898, - id., 1991). Pastor, ganadero, escritor y formidable ejemplo de prestancia y majencia aragonesa. Salvo esporádicos viajes a Madrid, siempre que fueron necesarias su inteligencia y diligencia en la defensa de la ganadería oscense, su vida transcurrió, desde los once años, junto a su ganado, en las deliciosas praderas de la Val de Ansó o en trashumancia hacia la Tierra Baja.
Portentoso caso de autodidactismo, profundo y enciclopédico conocedor de todos los aspectos de la ganadería: técnicos (pastos, enfermedades, terapéutica, leches, quesos, lanas), empresariales y económicos (industrialización y mercado), legales, incluso socioculturales, puso al servicio de la misma su excelente prosa en cientos de artículos en la prensa diaria y en la especializada. Continuo defensor de los intereses de su valle, que le ocasionaron no pocos disgustos, su autoridad moral e intelectual en Ansó y en el Alto Aragón eran bien conocidas. Discípulo espiritual de Domingo Miral, siguió con amor y atención constantes la vida de la Universidad de Jaca que él vio nacer y crecer.
Vistió desde la infancia el traje ansotano, en todo momento y circunstancia, con el señorío que le otorgaba la seguridad en sus raíces, con la prestancia que le daban su sensibilidad y figura y con la majencia inherente a su condición moral de perpetua búsqueda de lo esencial. No es de extrañar, por ello, que su fotografía de cuerpo entero ilustre la portada de varios tratados. En agosto de 1980 recibió el título de Pastor Mayor de Aragón.
• Obra: Ordenación de los montes de Ansó (1925). Ansó. Sus montes y su ganadería (1948). Notas de la vida de un pastor (Ansó, 1967).
• Bibliog.: Lacasa, J.: Cincuenta cursos de la Universidad de verano de Jaca; Zaragoza, 1980. Solsona, F.: Jorge Puyó y José Iranzo, arquetipos de la majencia aragonesa; Ansó, agosto, 1980
Comunicado de besugos. Federico Jimenez Losantos
La notita de la ETA perdonándoles la vida –de momento– a Francia y España, proclamándose la única instancia política y moral del País Vasco y marcando el camino que todas las fuerzas deben seguir para que no se enfade es uno de los papeluchos más infectos y eficaces que cabe recordar en las últimas décadas.
Dicen que ETA deja las armas. Nada más falso. Dicen que deja la actividad armada. Mentira. Dicen que deja de matar. Lo mismo que en las once treguas anteriores: mientras le convenga. Dicen que esta vez la tregua es definitiva. ¿Y cuándo no lo ha sido? ¿Qué tregua no se ha presentado como sincera? ¿Qué alto el fuego no se ha disfrazado de definitivo e irrevocable?
Ofende a la inteligencia que casi nadie quiera reparar en la literalidad de esta parte del comunicado con dos frases absolutamente contradictorias:
ETA ha decidido el cese definitivo de su actividad armada. ETA hace un llamamiento a los gobiernos de España y Francia para abrir un proceso de diálogo directo que tenga por objetivo la resolución de las consecuencias del conflicto y, así, la superación de la confrontación armada.
O sea, que ETA ha abandonado la "actividad armada", pero sólo si Francia y España hacen lo que deben, o sea, lo que mande la ETA, llegará "la superación de la confrontación armada". ¿Pero cómo puede "cesar la confrontación armada" si ya no hay actividad armada? Pues muy sencillo: porque todo es mentira: sigue la confrontación, la actividad armada, el terror, el chantaje y el proyecto totalitario de la ETA. Vamos, que el papelito etarra es una trola con la que se consolará Rubalcaba pero a la que nunca, por mero cálculo electoral, debería haberse plegado Mariano Rajoy.
Es mentira lo que dice la ETA, es mentira lo que dicen el PSOE y el PP, es una vergüenza que Rajoy elogie a jueces y fiscales que como Garzón, Cándido y demás pandilla trataron con mimo y excarcelaron a criminales como De Juana Chaos. El comunicado se burla de las víctimas de sus atentados hablando sólo de sus muertos (pocos, al lado de los que mataron); pero PSOE y PP se burlan de las víctimas y de toda la nación española diciendo que la ETA dice lo que no dice y que va a hacer lo que no va a hacer. Es un día de vergüenza para los españoles que aspiramos a no vivir de prestado por la gracia de la ETA ni en una burbuja de mentiras por embeleco del PSOE y del PP. Parodiando a Churchill diríamos: por no enfrentaros de verdad al terrorismo habéis creado la mentira de la paz. Tendréis una paz de mentira y, por supuesto, no os libraréis del terrorismo.
Francisco Jose Alcaraz: el fin y los fines de ETA
No estamos viviendo el fin de ETA, estamos ante los fines de ETA. Allá por el año 2004 denuncié que este proceso de negociación respondía a una hoja de ruta pactada entre PSOE y ETA 2000-2012.
Además de algunos ajustes en el proceso gracias a que las víctimas hemos sido un escollo en el proceso articulando la rebelión cívica, el adelanto electoral ha supuesto que Gobierno y ETA aceleren la fase final del proceso pactado. El comunicado de ETA era previsible y también su contenido: ETA y Gobierno aceleran los gestos y antes del 20-N veremos aún más.
ETA no está derrotada, los terroristas no han entregado las armas, los documentos que contienen información de objetivos, el dinero fruto de la extorsión y algún medio más. Los etarras no se reconocen como una organización terrorista, igualan a víctimas y verdugos al mantener que esto es una conflicto político. Los terroristas no se han entregado con las manos en alto para cumplir condena por sus delitos ni tampoco aportan la información para esclarecer las decenas de atentados de los que no se conocen los autores, como el de Irene Villa y su madre María Jesús González.
Si nada de esto se ha producido ¿qué celebran la clase política y sus medios afines? ¿Por qué los etarras y sus cómplices comparten esta misma sensación de ser vencedores? Si está vencida, ¿por qué tenemos que acceder a sus exigencias de negociar públicamente?
Las víctimas del terrorismo han sido, son y seguirán siendo un escollo para ETA y sus objetivos políticos. Si ETA con este comunicado trampa consigue prebendas como el acercamiento de presos, excarcelaciones e indultos encubiertos, los responsables directos de estas concesiones a ETA y los que apoyen al Gobierno estarán traicionando a vivos y a asesinados por ETA.
En los próximos días las víctimas del terrorismo vamos a vivir tiempos muy difíciles, pues todo por lo que hemos luchado durante tantos años –memoria, dignidad y justicia–, se va a tambalear por quienes buscan la rentabilidad política de este proceso.
Ante esta situación desdichada, tenemos la obligación moral de no ser cómplices de esta alta traición y por ello tenemos que salir ahora más que nunca el próximo 29 de octubre a las 13:00 horas en la plaza de la República Dominicana de Madrid, donde expondremos a quienes quieren hacernos cómplices de esta rendición , que FRENTE A LA IMPUNIDAD, JUSTICIA. RENDICIÓN EN MI NOMBRE ¡NO!
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Osho. Biography
Osho, born Chandra Mohan Jain (Hindi: चन्द्र मोहन जैन) (11 December 1931 – 19 January 1990), also known as Acharya Rajneesh from the 1960s onwards, calling himself Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh during the 1970s and 1980s and taking the name Osho in 1989, was an Indian mystic and spiritual teacher who garnered an international following. His syncretic teachings emphasise the importance of meditation, awareness, love, celebration, creativity and humour – qualities that he viewed as being suppressed by adherence to static belief systems, religious tradition and socialisation. His teachings have had a notable impact on Western New Age thought, and their popularity has increased markedly since his death.
Osho was a professor of philosophy and travelled throughout India in the 1960s as a public speaker. His views against socialism, Mahatma Gandhi, and institutionalised religion were controversial. He also advocated a more open attitude towards sexuality, a stance that earned him the sobriquet "sex guru" in the Indian and later the international press. In 1970 he settled for a while in Mumbai. He began initiating disciples (known as neo-sannyasins) and took on the role of a spiritual teacher. In his discourses, he reinterpreted writings of religious traditions, mystics and philosophers from around the world. Moving to Pune in 1974, he established an ashram that attracted increasing numbers of Westerners. The ashram offered therapies derived from the Human Potential Movement to its Western audience and made news in India and abroad, chiefly because of its permissive climate and Osho's provocative lectures. By the end of the 1970s, there were mounting tensions with the Indian government and the surrounding society.
In 1981, Osho relocated to the United States and his followers established an intentional community, later known as Rajneeshpuram, in the state of Oregon. Within a year the leadership of the commune became embroiled in a conflict with local residents, primarily over land use, which was marked by hostility on both sides. Osho's large collection of Rolls-Royce motorcars was also notorious. The Oregon commune collapsed in 1985 when Osho revealed that the commune leadership had committed a number of serious crimes, including a bioterror attack (food contamination) on the citizens of The Dalles. Osho was arrested shortly afterwards and charged with immigration violations. He was deported from the United States in accordance with a plea bargain. Twenty-one countries denied him entry, causing Osho to travel the world before returning to Pune, where he died in 1990. His ashram is today known as the Osho International Meditation Reso
Osho was a professor of philosophy and travelled throughout India in the 1960s as a public speaker. His views against socialism, Mahatma Gandhi, and institutionalised religion were controversial. He also advocated a more open attitude towards sexuality, a stance that earned him the sobriquet "sex guru" in the Indian and later the international press. In 1970 he settled for a while in Mumbai. He began initiating disciples (known as neo-sannyasins) and took on the role of a spiritual teacher. In his discourses, he reinterpreted writings of religious traditions, mystics and philosophers from around the world. Moving to Pune in 1974, he established an ashram that attracted increasing numbers of Westerners. The ashram offered therapies derived from the Human Potential Movement to its Western audience and made news in India and abroad, chiefly because of its permissive climate and Osho's provocative lectures. By the end of the 1970s, there were mounting tensions with the Indian government and the surrounding society.
In 1981, Osho relocated to the United States and his followers established an intentional community, later known as Rajneeshpuram, in the state of Oregon. Within a year the leadership of the commune became embroiled in a conflict with local residents, primarily over land use, which was marked by hostility on both sides. Osho's large collection of Rolls-Royce motorcars was also notorious. The Oregon commune collapsed in 1985 when Osho revealed that the commune leadership had committed a number of serious crimes, including a bioterror attack (food contamination) on the citizens of The Dalles. Osho was arrested shortly afterwards and charged with immigration violations. He was deported from the United States in accordance with a plea bargain. Twenty-one countries denied him entry, causing Osho to travel the world before returning to Pune, where he died in 1990. His ashram is today known as the Osho International Meditation Reso
La vida es sueño. Soliloquio de Segismundo.
“Sueña el rey que es rey, y vive
con este engaño mandando,
disponiendo y gobernando;
y este aplauso , que recibe
prestado, en el viento escribe,
y en cenizas le convierte
la muerte, ¡desdicha fuerte!:
¿que hay quien intente reinar,
viendo que ha de despertar
en el sueño de la muerte_
Sueña el rico en su riqueza,
que más cuidados le ofrece;
sueña el pobre que padece
su miseria y su pobreza;
sueña el que a medrar empieza,
sueña el que afana y pretende,
sueña el que agravia y ofende,
y en el mundo, en conclusión,
todos sueñan lo que son,
aunque ninguno lo entiende.
Yo sueño que estoy aquí
destas prisiones cargado,
y soñé que en otro estado
más lisonjero me vi.
¿Qué es la vida?, un frenesí;
¿qué es la vida?, una ilusión,
una sombra, una ficción,
y el mayor bien es pequeño:
que toda la vida es sueño,
y los sueños, sueños son.”
Visiones
Veo una habitación. Las paredes decoradas de papel ajado. Una densa niebla baña los sueños dejados por quienes como él, un día también lloraron ahí. Unos visillos de sabor ahumado cubren el único ojo de la estancia. Está anocheciendo y las sombras se multiplican en el infinito. También veo la figura de un cuerpo. Está arrodillado con la cabeza agachada y escondida entre las palmas de sus gruesas manos. Su pelo encanecido advierte de muchas batallas perdidas. Una raída camiseta adornada de agujeros cubre su pecho. Lágrimas como perlas se deslizan por el dorso de sus manos... lágrimas sin un destino cierto que servirán para alimentar olvidos y rencores.
Escucho el sonido lejano de una música venida sin invitación como la explosión de una tormenta entre un calor de canícula. Es una música triste que oscurece la penosa llama de una vela arrumbada en el rincón de la desolación. Es una música de angustia, es una música de desesperación que anticipa ilusiones sin esperanza... es una música vomitada de una radio en cuyo dial, la aguja decidió dejar de caminar eternamente desengañada como el enamorado que descubrió otro protagonista en la historia.
Veo cómo el hombre despega el rostro de sus manos. Cómo con pasos cansados y movimientos perpetuos, cambia con su silueta el paisaje devuelto por la luna del espejo... un espejo agrietado como el rostro de un anciano anegado por arrugas sempiternas.
Veo cómo vuelve sobre sus pasos y se dirige hacia un enorme armario instalado por operarios con perentorios deseos de que la jornada acabe. Veo cómo de uno de los cajones, extrae un viejo revólver. Veo cómo lo inspecciona con detenimiento de cirujano y lo encañona contra su sien. Veo cómo el tiempo deja de existir y un estallido violento se confunde en el silencio traído por la Muerte. Veo cómo el cuerpo impacta con el frío suelo... Veo como el arma queda al lado de una vieja fotografía, triste y descolorida como una hoja recién caída... una fotografía perteneciente a otro tiempo en la que puede contemplarse una familia feliz extinguida al fin por la crueldad del Destino...
Elegance, by Chögyam Trungpa.
Elegance here means appreciating things as they are. Things as you are and things as they are. There is a sense of delight and of fearlessness. You are not fearful of dark corners. If there are any dark, mysterious corners, black and confusing, you override them with your glory, your sense of beauty, your sense of cleanness, your feeling of being regal. Because you can override fearfulness in this way, tantra, or the highest stage in Tibetan Buddhist practice, is known as the king of all the yanas or stages on the path. You take an attitude of having perfectly complete and very rich basic sanity.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Antoni de Mello. The Way to Love. Quotes III
-"If you ever allow yourself to see it will be the death of you. And that is why love is to terrifying, for to love is to see and to see is to die. But it is also the most delightful exhilarating experience in the whole world. For in the death of the ego is freedom, peace, serenity, joy"
-"The secret is to renounce nothing, cling to nothing, enjoy everything and allow it to pass, to flow by many hours of observing the rottenness, the corrupt nature of an attachment"
-"What they say about you reveals more about them than about you"
-"Will you not be more effective if you were not irritated? Irritation only cloud your perception and make your action less effective"
-"To understand all is to forgive all"
-"Each time you leave the object of your attachment, you leave your heart there, so you cannot invest it in the next place you go to"
-"The secret is to renounce nothing, cling to nothing, enjoy everything and allow it to pass, to flow by many hours of observing the rottenness, the corrupt nature of an attachment"
-"What they say about you reveals more about them than about you"
-"Will you not be more effective if you were not irritated? Irritation only cloud your perception and make your action less effective"
-"To understand all is to forgive all"
-"Each time you leave the object of your attachment, you leave your heart there, so you cannot invest it in the next place you go to"
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Monday, October 3, 2011
The Column: The Zapatero's legacy. General Elections 11-20
Year 2008. 3-9. Zapatero's prime minister after interview on one of the many governmental TV's off the record:
-Interviewer: How are the polls?
-Zapatero: Well. It is convenient for us to have tension on the campaign.
This is one of the many sides of this character and all of them filled with despicable tinges of radicalism, extremism, incompetency, unprofessionalism and sectarian ignorance. I hope for the sake of my country that it will pass a long time to have someone like him on the Moncloa's office. It's been almost eight years of his presidency. I already warned what was going to happen at the time of the last general election if this person would be elected again. It was on March the 9th of 2008. Well, 11 million people voted again on him. The outcome of this decision has been clear: Spain is about to be taken over by the European Union. There is a 21% of unemployment ratio. The whole nation is divided and disintegrated with many parts of the country that rivals one another fiercely instead of working together for the same cause.
It is though what Zapatero has been doing with a total proficiency: making Spaniards enemies to each others. Instead uniting them, make them fight. Instead of advocating for a sole country walking together, battling and making sides: the good ones, his and the enemies, the opposition followers.
Zapatero has never hesitated on his purpose. He needed all the support from all the radical sectors of the country. With him, any means justifies the cause. At any cost, even if this cost is poverty, disaggregation, humiliation, loss of respect and consideration as a country to quote just a few factors. He even betrayed those victims whose lives built the main pillars that any country has to be settle on: Memory, Dignity and Justice.
He is not going to run for presidency this time. How could if he ruined all the things that he touched? Time always places everyone on his place. What is the Zapatero's legacy? The answer is heartbreaking: 44 % of unemployment for people between 22 and 40 years old. The country is paying huge amounts of interests because of the large debts that Zapatero created. At this time, Spain is a broken country. Democracy barely still survives with judges, media, public prosecutors and police departments working for the benefit of him and his political party.
On November the 20th there are General Elections again. Spain needs a change, or better an agreement between the two big parties to get a consensus in order to work for Spain as a country, for the main interest of it, not just for a few sectarian regions occupied on growing with the investments that should be distributed among all the regions according to one of the major principles: general interest.
I wrote almost 4 years ago that voting for Zapatero was the same as voting for poverty, sectarian principles, incompetency, radicalism and bankruptcy. Time sadly proved me right. Now I say that voting for PSOE is the same as before. It is what Socialism brings in Spain: poverty, unemployment and division.
The same as just a few main characteristics of Zapatero's legacy.
Friday, September 30, 2011
The way to love. Antony De Mello. Quotes II
-"You must choose between your attachment and happiness"
-"Love can exist only in freedom"
-"There is only one way to win the battle of attachments: drop them"
-"You can only be a revolutionary when you see the prison walls in the first place"
-"Love can exist only in freedom"
-"There is only one way to win the battle of attachments: drop them"
-"You can only be a revolutionary when you see the prison walls in the first place"
Quotes from The way to love by Anthony de Mello
-"Your mind is creating unhappiness all the time"
-"An attachment is a state of clinging that comes from the false belief that something or someone is necessary for you happiness"
-"It is not possible for you to say that you are happy because the moment you become conscious of your happiness you cease to be happy"
-"A good deed is never so good as when you have no consciousness that it is good"
-"All you need to do is to open your eyes and see that you do not really the object of your attachment at all"
-"An attachment is a state of clinging that comes from the false belief that something or someone is necessary for you happiness"
-"It is not possible for you to say that you are happy because the moment you become conscious of your happiness you cease to be happy"
-"A good deed is never so good as when you have no consciousness that it is good"
-"All you need to do is to open your eyes and see that you do not really the object of your attachment at all"
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Sunday, September 4, 2011
In Honor of Teachers. Charles M. Blow
Since it’s back-to-school season across the country, I wanted to celebrate a group that is often maligned: teachers. Like so many others, it was a teacher who changed the direction of my life, and to whom I’m forever indebted.
But how do we expect to entice the best and brightest to become teachers when we keep tearing the profession down? We take the people who so desperately want to make a difference that they enter a field where they know that they’ll be overworked and underpaid, and we scapegoat them as the cause of a societywide failure.
A March report by the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development found that one of the differences between the United States and countries with high-performing school systems was: “The teaching profession in the U.S. does not have the same high status as it once did, nor does it compare with the status teachers enjoy in the world’s best-performing economies.”
The report highlights two examples of this diminished status:
• “According to a 2005 National Education Association report, nearly 50 percent of new teachers leave the profession within their first five years teaching; they cite poor working conditions and low pay as the chief reason.”
• “High school teachers in the U.S. work longer hours (approximately 50 hours, according to the N.E.A.), and yet the U.S. devotes a far lower proportion than the average O.E.C.D. country does to teacher salaries.”
Take Wisconsin, for instance, where a new law stripped teachers of collective bargaining rights and forced them to pay more for benefits. According to documents obtained by The Associated Press, “about twice as many public schoolteachers decided to hang it up in the first half of this year as in each of the past two full years.”
I’m not saying that we shouldn’t seek to reform our education system. We should, and we must. Nor am I saying that all teachers are great teachers. They aren’t. But let’s be honest: No profession is full of peak performers. At least this one is infused with nobility.
And we as parents, and as a society at large, must also acknowledge our shortcomings and the enormous hurdles that teachers must often clear to reach a child. Teachers may be the biggest in-school factor, but there are many out-of-school factors that weigh heavily on performance, like growing child poverty, hunger, homelessness, home and neighborhood instability, adult role-modeling and parental pressure and expectations.
The first teacher to clear those hurdles in my life was Mrs. Thomas.
From the first through third grades, I went to school in a neighboring town because it was the school where my mother got her first teaching job. I was not a great student. I was slipping in and out of depression from a tumultuous family life that included the recent divorce of my parents. I began to grow invisible. My teachers didn’t seem to see me nor I them. (To this day, I can’t remember any of their names.)
My work began to suffer so much that I was temporarily placed in the “slow” class. No one even talked to me about it. They just sent a note. I didn’t believe that I was slow, but I began to live down to their expectations.
When I entered the fourth grade, my mother got a teaching job in our hometown and I came back to my hometown school. I was placed in Mrs. Thomas’s class.
There I was, a little nothing of a boy, lost and slumped, flickering in and out of being.
She was a pint-sized firecracker of a woman, with short curly hair, big round glasses set wider than her face, and a thin slit of a mouth that she kept well-lined with red lipstick.
On the first day of class, she gave us a math quiz. Maybe it was the nervousness of being the “new kid,” but I quickly jotted down the answers and turned in the test — first.
“Whoa! That was quick. Blow, we’re going to call you Speedy Gonzales.” She said it with a broad approving smile, and the kind of eyes that warmed you on the inside.
She put her arm around me and pulled me close while she graded my paper with the other hand. I got a couple wrong, but most of them right.
I couldn’t remember a teacher ever smiling with approval, or putting their hand around me, or praising my performance in any way.
It was the first time that I felt a teacher cared about me, saw me or believed in me. It lit a fire in me. I never got a bad grade again. I figured that Mrs. Thomas would always be able to see me if I always shined. I always wanted to make her as proud of me as she seemed to be that day. And, she always was.
In high school, the district sent a man to test our I.Q.’s. Turns out that not only was I not slow, but mine and another boy’s I.Q. were high enough that they created a gifted-and-talented class just for the two of us with our own teacher who came to our school once a week. I went on to graduate as the valedictorian of my class.
And all of that was because of Mrs. Thomas, the firecracker of a teacher who first saw me and smiled with the smile that warmed me on the inside.
So to all of the Mrs. Thomases out there, all the teachers struggling to reach lost children like I was once, I just want to say thank you. You deserve our admiration, not our contempt
Saturday, September 3, 2011
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Empire Of The Sun - Half Mast
Come on now can we talk about it like we used to talk about
Hotel in the hills with a carousel
Farmhouse in the front a tractor in the lounge
Oh oh oh honey I need you round I know I know
Listen now can we talk in love and walk the town
Be easy now, go hiking through the hills in a summer gown
Raise the kids, peace within and make our sound
Hear me now, I'm down on knees and praying
Though my faith is weak
Without you so please baby please give us a chance
Make a mends and I will stand until the end
A million times a trillion more
Oh oh oh honey I need you round I know I know
Smile baby don't cry
I will only fly with you by my side
Baby I'm cornered now
Baby don't push me out
Lately I walk in doubt
Maybe it's crashing down
Baby can you save it now
Oh oh oh honey I need you round I know I know
Oh oh oh honey I need you round I know I know
Baby I'm cornered now
Baby don't push me out
Lately I walk in doubt
Maybe it's crashing down
Baby I'm cornered now
Baby don't push me out
Lately I walk in doubt
Maybe it's crashing down
Workaholism from Rework
Our culture celebrates the idea of the workaholic. We
hear about people burning the midnight oil. They pull
all- nighters and sleep at the office. It’s considered a
badge of honor to kill yourself over a project. No
amount of work is too much work.
Not only is this workaholism unnecessary, it’s stupid. Working more doesn’t mean you care more or get
more done. It just means you work more.
Workaholics wind up creating more problems than
they solve. First off, working like that just isn’t sustainable over time. When the burnout crash comes— and it
will— it’ll hit that much harder.
Workaholics miss the point, too. They try to fix
problems by throwing sheer hours at them. They try to
make up for intellectual laziness with brute force. This
results in inelegant solutions.
They even create crises. They don’t look for ways to
be more efficient because they actually like working
overtime. They enjoy feeling like heroes. They create
problems (often unwittingly) just so they can get off on
working more.
Workaholics make the people who don’t stay late
feel inadequate for “merely” working reasonable hours.
That leads to guilt and poor morale all around. Plus, it
Planning is guessing. From Rework.
Unless you’re a fortune- teller, long- term business planning is a fantasy. There are just too many factors that are
out of your hands: market conditions, competitors, customers, the economy, etc. Writing a plan makes you feel
in control of things you can’t actually control.
Why don’t we just call plans what they really are:
guesses. Start referring to your business plans as business
guesses, your financial plans as financial guesses, and
your strategic plans as strategic guesses. Now you can
stop worrying about them as much. They just aren’t
worth the stress.
When you turn guesses into plans, you enter a danger zone. Plans let the past drive the future. They put
blinders on you. “This is where we’re going because,
well, that’s where we said we were going.” And that’s the
problem: Plans are inconsistent with improvisation.
And you have to be able to improvise. You have to
be able to pick up opportunities that come along. Sometimes you need to say, “We’re going in a new direction
because that’s what makes sense today.”
The timing of long- range plans is screwed up too.
You have the most information when you’re doing
something, not before you’ve done it. Yet when do you
write a plan? Usually it’s before you’ve even begun.
That’s the worst time to make a big decision.
Monday, August 15, 2011
Stop coddling the super rich.
OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.
While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors.
These and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us, much as if we were spotted owls or some other endangered species. It’s nice to have friends in high places.
Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent.
If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine — most likely by a lot.
To understand why, you need to examine the sources of government revenue. Last year about 80 percent of these revenues came from personal income taxes and payroll taxes. The mega-rich pay income taxes at a rate of 15 percent on most of their earnings but pay practically nothing in payroll taxes. It’s a different story for the middle class: typically, they fall into the 15 percent and 25 percent income tax brackets, and then are hit with heavy payroll taxes to boot.
Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.
I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off. And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation.
Since 1992, the I.R.S. has compiled data from the returns of the 400 Americans reporting the largest income. In 1992, the top 400 had aggregate taxable income of $16.9 billion and paid federal taxes of 29.2 percent on that sum. In 2008, the aggregate income of the highest 400 had soared to $90.9 billion — a staggering $227.4 million on average — but the rate paid had fallen to 21.5 percent.
The taxes I refer to here include only federal income tax, but you can be sure that any payroll tax for the 400 was inconsequential compared to income. In fact, 88 of the 400 in 2008 reported no wages at all, though every one of them reported capital gains. Some of my brethren may shun work but they all like to invest. (I can relate to that.)
I know well many of the mega-rich and, by and large, they are very decent people. They love America and appreciate the opportunity this country has given them. Many have joined the Giving Pledge, promising to give most of their wealth to philanthropy. Most wouldn’t mind being told to pay more in taxes as well, particularly when so many of their fellow citizens are truly suffering.
Twelve members of Congress will soon take on the crucial job of rearranging our country’s finances. They’ve been instructed to devise a plan that reduces the 10-year deficit by at least $1.5 trillion. It’s vital, however, that they achieve far more than that. Americans are rapidly losing faith in the ability of Congress to deal with our country’s fiscal problems. Only action that is immediate, real and very substantial will prevent that doubt from morphing into hopelessness. That feeling can create its own reality.
Job one for the 12 is to pare down some future promises that even a rich America can’t fulfill. Big money must be saved here. The 12 should then turn to the issue of revenues. I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged and continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to the payroll tax. This cut helps the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get.
But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.
My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.
Warren E. Buffett is the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway.
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Luis del Pino: Editorial, Vejaciones
''...Ahora que esta malhadada legislatura se acerca a su final, ahora que la nefasta era de Zapatero se termina, no puedo evitar sentir - cuando miro hacia atrás - el mismo tipo de extrañeza que con esa obra de Satié, "Vejaciones".
Porque a lo largo de estos siete años, los españoles hemos podido ver cómo Zapatero ha ido poniendo sobre la mesa ocurrencia tras ocurrencia, en un frenesí legislativo incomprensible.
Pero lo sorprendente, para mi, no es que Zapatero - ese Zapatero iluminado, ese Zapatero fatuo, ese Zapatero mentiroso, ese Zapatero enloquecido - haya llevado a cabo una acción de gobierno destructiva. Lo sorprendente es que cada una de sus ocurrencias - desde la negociación con ETA a la Ley de Memoria Histórica, pasando por las leyes de igualdad, la educación para la ciudadanía y la ley del aborto - ha encontrado a gente, a mucha gente, dispuesta a secundarla, a explicarla y a justificarla.
El problema no es que los locos o los malvados existan. El problema es que cualquier ocurrencia de un loco o de un malvado encuentra a gente dispuesta a asumirla con naturalidad.
Lo cual dice muy poco, qué quieren que les diga, del género humano''
Despilfarrros ZP: El Gobierno dilapida otros 650.000 euros en financiar la Alianza de Civilizaciones y mantener a los aliados Cuba, Bolivia y Venezuela
El Gobierno dilapida otros 650.000 euros en financiar la Alianza de Civilizaciones
- 13-08-2011 | 48
Exteriores sufraga una vez más el malogrado proyecto de Zapatero en el ocaso de la legislatura. Concede también subvenciones millonarias a Cuba, Bolivia y Venezuela.- David Martínez. MadridEl agonizante Gobierno de José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, a sólo unos meses de abandonar el poder, volvió a destinar ayer partidas millonarias para financiar el que ha sido su proyecto estrella en política exterior, la Alianza de Civilizaciones, así como diferentes actividades de sus más fieles aliados del escenario internacional: los países iberoamericanos que presiden Raúl Castro, Hugo Chávez, Evo Morales y compañía.El BOE publicaba ayer una nueva relación de subvenciones concedidas por el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, a través de la Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo, aBolivia, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua y otros países iberoamericanos y africanos, además de dedicar una partida especial que alcanza los 650.000 euros a la Alianza de Civilizaciones. Ni en los estertores de su mandato se resigna el Ejecutivo socialista a reconocer el fracaso de este proyecto, cuyos resultados reales todavía no han dado los frutos esperados. La excusa esgrimida esta vez para financiar la Alianza es que el dinero se dedicará a “analizar las causas de las divisiones que ponen en peligro la paz” y proponer “medidas políticas concretas” para solucionar esos desajustes. Pero esta subvención es sólo la punta del iceberg de las millonarias partidas que el Ministerio de Exteriores va a destinar a patrocinar proyectos internacionales de manera altruista, en los que España ni participa ni se beneficia. Así, por ejemplo, se dan casi dos millones de euros a la dictadura cubana de los Castro, para su “Programa de desarrollo rural en el Oriente” de la isla y otros 754.000 a la Bolivia de Evo Morales, para que financie sus “compromisos de la X Reunión de la Comisión Mixta de Cooperación Hispano-Boliviana”, entre otras actividades.El despilfarro gubernamental también beneficia a Hugo Chávez, a quien se destina una partida de300.000 euros para el mantenimiento de dos escuelas-taller en Venezuela. Pero la gran favorecida es, sin duda, la Nicaragua del sandinista Daniel Ortega, a cuyas manos irán a parar ocho millones de euros de nuestras maltrechas arcas públicas, con el objetivo de ayudar en el “desarrollo integral” del Barrio Acahualinca, en la capital del país, Managua.La generosidad del Ejecutivo socialista también alcanza para financiar proyectos de organismos internacionales, como cuatro de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo, que recibirá un total de tres millones y medio con cargo a nuestro presupuesto público.
Friday, August 12, 2011
Intereconomia editoria: las arcas estan vacias
Las arcas están vacías y la insuficiencia de recursos ya está alcanzando a los sectores más desfavorecidos de la sociedad. Las farmacias, antaño pujantes negocios que permitían a una familia vivir acomodadamente durante varias generaciones, están acumulando impagados por parte de una Administración que, tras años de pauperizadora gestión socialista, se ha quedado sin fondos; y si las farmacias no cobran por los medicamentos que entregan con receta, terminarán interrumpiendo sus servicios, en claro perjuicio de enfermos y ancianos. Pero, ¿cómo hemos podido llegar a una situación de semejante ruina? ¿Cuándo devenimos un país tan poco serio como para no honrar nuestras obligaciones? No, desde luego, a partir del 22-M, tal como ahora quieren hacernos creer los irresponsables políticos y voceros del PSOE, sino más bien durante los últimos años en los que los socialistas coparon casi todas las instituciones.
Al cabo, Zapatero recibió en 2004 unas finanzas públicas ajustadas y en orden. En apenas dos legislaturas, el Gobierno del PP había cuadrado ingresos y gastos pese a partir del enorme déficit del 6% que le había legado el felipismo. Nada que ver, por consiguiente, la situación que se encontró Aznar con la que se encontró Zapatero: el primero recibió un edificio en ruinas que consiguió rehabilitar en un complejo de lujo y el segundo tomó esa notable hacienda para implosionarla desde dentro.
Fue la burbuja inmobiliaria, y la consecuente alza de los ingresos públicos vinculados al ladrillo, lo que deslumbró a Zapatero y le llevó a ser el más imprudente e insensato de cuantos socialistas han gobernado alguna de las Administraciones de este país. Sin ser consciente de que alrededor del 30% de todos los impuestos recaudados durante los años del boom artificial tenderían a desaparecer con la burbuja, el presidente del Gobierno comenzó a despilfarrar sin ton ni son el dinero público –ese que según una de sus ministras, la ínclita Carmen Calvo, “no era de nadie”– en gastos consolidados que seguirían comprometidos aun cuando la economía pinchara: ayudas milmillonarias a las energías renovables, subvenciones absurdas a todo tipo de grupos de presión (dudosas ONG, sindicatos, patronal, cine español, coche eléctrico, promoción de lenguas regionales…), cheques-bebé, reparto de bombillas de bajo consumo, embajadas autonómicas, ley de dependencia, etc.
Durante las legislaturas de Zapatero y de sus barones autonómicos, el Estado ha crecido desproporcionadamente, hasta el punto de que hoy ni siquiera queda dinero para que las distintas Administraciones cumplan con una de sus principales obligaciones: pagar sus deudas. Porque, en última instancia, lo que sucede en Castilla-La Mancha como consecuencia de la dispendiosa gestión de José María Barreda es lo mismo que temen los inversores internacionales que vaya a pasar con ellos: que los gastos inflados del zapaterismo continúen fagocitando la totalidad de los ingresos públicos y no haya dinero para todos.
Por eso resulta imprescindible que el Ejecutivo central y los autonómicos se tomen muy en serio el prioritario objetivo de recuperar el equilibrio presupuestario. No se ha de gastar un euro más del que se ingresa, en caso no habrá recursos ni siquiera para atender los desembolsos más básicos. Toca sacar la tijera para eliminar sin miramientos todas las partidas superfluas, así como recuperar la Ley de déficit cero que Aznar aprobó y que Zapatero se encargó de enterrar para dar rienda suelta al endeudamiento autonómico. Pero para ello, antes será necesario anticipar de nuevo las elecciones.
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Saturday, August 6, 2011
The Washington Times Editorial: Obama’s downgraded America
The Obama administration has made history by presiding over the first-ever downgrade in the U.S. credit rating. President Obama has outdone all his predecessors in wrecking America’s good name. His answer to this problem: Spend even more.
Raising the debt ceiling was sold as a way of guaranteeing the U.S. credit rating. It had the opposite effect, which makes sense to anyone who understands credit. Take a family with a median household income around $50,000. If they spend $85,000 a year and have debt at $300,000 and growing, it’d be foolish to let them borrow more because they don’t have the income to pay it back. Raising the debt ceiling ignored this reality. Then, the Obama administration immediately demonstrated its utter lack of creditworthiness by blowing 60 percent of the initial $400 billion increase in one day, the largest single-day accumulation of debt in U.S. history.
The White House blames the George W. Bush administration for every economic woe, but the numbers speak for themselves. In 2008, the federal budget deficit was around 3 percent of gross domestic product. In 2011, it’s around 11 percent. Total federal debt was $10.7 trillion at the end of 2008 and is currently $14.3 trillion. Debt as a percentage of GDP was a painful 69 percent at the end of the Bush years, but Mr. Obama is pushing it over 100 percent, another disgraceful historic milestone. A record 45.8 million are on food stamps, and the percentage of working-aged Americans who have jobs is the lowest in three decades. According to Gallup’s daily tracking poll, in late January, 44 percent of Americans felt the economy was getting better, and 52 percent thought it was worsening. Now only 17 percent have a positive view; 77 percent understand our economy is nosediving.
The Standard & Poor’s ratings downgrade is only the beginning. Moody’s Investors Service still lists the United States as AAA but with a “watch negative” caveat, and S&P managing director John Chambers warned that should U.S. debt go over 100 percent of GDP, America would face a second downgrade. Speaker John A. Boehner should immediately call the House into emergency session to start passing serious budget cuts to stave off this looming credit disaster. If Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid chooses to block these necessary measures, Democrats can shoulder the blame.
Mr. Obama is blithely passing the buck. At a Wednesday fundraiser, he refused to own up to his responsibility for the economic calamity America is facing, saying “because we were inheriting so many challenges, we’re not even halfway there yet. When I said, ‘change we can believe in,’ I didn’t say ‘change we can believe in tomorrow.’ ” If the nation continues on this disastrous course Mr. Obama has set, there will be no tomorrow.
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Pema Chodron: SEEING OURSELVES CLEARLY
When we begin to see clearly what we do, how we get hooked and swept away by old habits, our usual tendency is to use that as a reason to get discouraged, a reason to feel really bad about ourselves. Instead, we could realize how remarkable it is that we actually have the capacity to see ourselves honestly, and that doing this takes courage. It is moving in the direction of seeing our life as a teacher rather than as a burden. This involves, fundamentally, learning to stay present, but learning to stay with a sense of humor, learning to stay with loving-kindness toward ourselves and with the outer situation, learning to take joy in the magic ingredient of honest self-reflection.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Pema Chodron. Cherish Ordinary moments
In our most ordinary days we have moments of happiness, moments of comfort and enjoyment, moments of seeing something that pleased us, something that touched us, moments of contacting the tenderness of our hearts. We can take joy in that. I find that it’s essential during the day to actually note when I feel happiness or when something positive happens, and to begin to cherish those moments as precious. Gradually we can begin to cherish the preciousness of our whole life just as it is, with its ups and downs, its failures and successes, its roughness and smoothness.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Pema Chodron. Natural warmth
The natural warmth that emerges when we experience pain includes all the heart qualities: love, compassion, gratitude, tenderness in any form. It also includes loneliness, sorrow, and the shakiness of fear. Before these vulnerable feelings harden, before the storylines kick in, these generally unwanted feelings are pregnant with kindness, with openness and caring. These feelings that we’ve become so accomplished at avoiding can soften us, can transform us. The openheartedness of natural warmth is sometimes pleasant, sometimes unplesant. The practice is to train in not automatically fleeing from uncomfortable tenderness when it arises.
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Pema Chodron. The inbetween state
Life is a good teacher and a good friend. Things are always in transition, if we could only realize it. Nothing ever sums itself up in the way that we like to dream about. The off-center, in-between state is an ideal situation, a situation in which we don’t get caught and we can open our hearts and minds beyond limit. It’s a very tender, nonaggressive, open-ended state of affairs.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Why are you so far away?
-Why are you so far? She asked.
-Why you never want to know that I am in love with you... that I am in love with you? The Cure. Just like Heaven.
Where to?
I never said that I would stay until the end... I never promised you chimeras, dreams... not even appetizing utopias...
Because since always,- and now I realize-, I was made of awareness, pain and holy sorrow.
Yes... all of that helps me look up and go on, running away from frequency, daring anyone brave enough to assault me with false promises, futile caresses, vane ideas to share lies...
No! This ending towards which you go is not mine! I never chose it! Rather, I prefer to continue my path, because next to you, sincerity would always hurt and we would misinterpret affection as Love... and I am afraid... I would not have any strength to put up with so much effort not to get asleep...
For that reason I am going away... from you and all the rest just like you... in search of others different from you and me, from your world and mine but able to appreciate how the last season is from the beginning of times...
Please, keep the decoration, the pictures... portraits of daily fake... keep your cravings for locking winds in beautiful bottles... your trodden carpets by vulgar soles...
Stay if that's your will... melt into mirages and ridicule melodies lacking of any truth... hollow like the hit against the emptiness... with no passion like that one who lowered his arms even before starting....
Stay then... if that's your wish. But don't expect me to do the same, because my track and yours, and the majority’s around, are as different as day and night, as appearance and Eternity...
Now I begin to know how the last breeze smells like... so happy... truly and completely... far... so far... at last...
-Why you never want to know that I am in love with you... that I am in love with you? The Cure. Just like Heaven.
Where to?
I never said that I would stay until the end... I never promised you chimeras, dreams... not even appetizing utopias...
Because since always,- and now I realize-, I was made of awareness, pain and holy sorrow.
Yes... all of that helps me look up and go on, running away from frequency, daring anyone brave enough to assault me with false promises, futile caresses, vane ideas to share lies...
No! This ending towards which you go is not mine! I never chose it! Rather, I prefer to continue my path, because next to you, sincerity would always hurt and we would misinterpret affection as Love... and I am afraid... I would not have any strength to put up with so much effort not to get asleep...
For that reason I am going away... from you and all the rest just like you... in search of others different from you and me, from your world and mine but able to appreciate how the last season is from the beginning of times...
Please, keep the decoration, the pictures... portraits of daily fake... keep your cravings for locking winds in beautiful bottles... your trodden carpets by vulgar soles...
Stay if that's your will... melt into mirages and ridicule melodies lacking of any truth... hollow like the hit against the emptiness... with no passion like that one who lowered his arms even before starting....
Stay then... if that's your wish. But don't expect me to do the same, because my track and yours, and the majority’s around, are as different as day and night, as appearance and Eternity...
Now I begin to know how the last breeze smells like... so happy... truly and completely... far... so far... at last...
Pema Chodron. This brief lifetime
How are we going to spend this brief lifetime? Are we going to strengthen our well-perfected ability to struggle against uncertainty, or are we going to train in letting go? Are we going to hold on stubbornly to “I’m like this and you’re like that”? Or are we going to move beyond that narrow mind? Could we start to train as a warrior, aspiring to reconnect with the natural flexibility of our being and to help others do the same? If we start to move in this direction, limitless possibilities will begin to open up.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Saturday, July 2, 2011
US Heath insurance
What is a deductible and how does it work?
Typically, a deductible is the amount of money you must pay each year before your health insurance plan starts to pay for covered medical expenses. For example, with a $100,000 heart surgery bill, you would be responsible for paying the first $1,000. After this $1,000 deductible is met, the insurance company will pay a percentage of the bill in what is called the coinsurance.
What is coinsurance?
Coinsurance is a cost-sharing requirement where you are responsible for paying a certain percentage and the insurance company will pay the remaining percentage of the covered medical expenses after your deductible is met. For a health insurance plan with 20% coinsurance, once the deductible is met, the insurance company will pay 80% of the covered expenses while you pay the remaining 20% until your out-of-pocket limit is reached for the year. Typically, the out-of-pocket limit is the maximum amount you will pay out of your own pocket for covered medical expenses in a given year. For a plan with a $2,000 out-of-pocket limit, you will pay a $1,000 deductible and $1,000 coinsurance while the insurance company covers the remaining $98,000 of the heart surgery bill. Even if you are hospitalized again in the same year, the insurance company will pay 100% of your covered expenses within the limit of the lifetime maximum.
What are co-pays?
A co-payment or co-pay is a specific flat fee you pay for each medical service, such as $30 for an office visit, after which the insurance company often pays the remainder of the covered medical charges. Let's say you are not feeling well and went to see your doctor who charges $200 for the office visit. If your insurance plan has an office visit co-payment of $30, then you will only be responsible for the $30 and the insurance company will cover the remaining $170.
Do I have to meet my deductible before I see my doctor?
With some health insurance policies the answer is YES, but today, most health insurance plans do NOT require this. Most companies today offer plans wherein the deductible usually only applies while hospitalized or for more major procedures, such as CT scans or MRIs. Most plans today allow you to visit doctors and specialists, and fill prescriptions, with simply a co-pay.
What is "Out-of-Pocket-Maximum?"
This is the amount of money one would pay out of their own pocket towards their medical expenses in any given year. An out of pocket expense can refer to how much the co-payment, coinsurance, or deductible is. Also, when the term annual out-of-pocket maximum is used, that is referring to how much the insured would have to pay for the whole year out of their pocket, excluding premiums. Usually, your maximum out-of-pocket is never more than a couple of thousand dollars over and above your chosen deductible.
What is a network?
A network is a list of doctors, hospitals and other providers that have contracted, or agreed, with an insurance company to do business with the insurance company. The providers fees have been pre-negotiated, which means that the insurance company will not necessarily pay the doctor or hospital what your actual medical bills are, but will pay a lower amount. For example, when you have a gall bladder removed at a hospital, the hospital's charges, if you did not have health insurance, might be $10,000. But under the network pre-negotiated amount, the hospital may only receive $4,000 as payment in full. This saves you and the insurance company money. If you have a health insurance plan that utilizes a network and you use providers that are not part of the network, the amount of money that you would have to pay for those services will be considerably higher than if you had used providers that were in the network. Your insurance company will probably pay some part of those non-network bills, but you'll be paying a whole lot more. Always stay in your network if possible.
What's the difference between a Primary Care Physician (PCP) and a specialist?
A Primary Care Physician, or PCP, is the doctor you would go to on a regular basis, such as when you're simply not feeling well, or have an ear ache or the flu. A specialist is a doctor that your PCP might refer you to if the problem you have requires a doctor with more experience in a certain area. For example, if you contacted your PCP complaining about chest pains, your PCP would most probably refer you to a heart doctor (a cardiologist) who would have more advanced equipment and training to help you.
What is a pre-existing condition?
A pre-existing condition is any health condition you have or have had prior to applying for a policy. For example, if you currently have had kidney stones at any time during your life, then kidney stones would be considered a pre-existing condition. Some insurance companies want to know about your pre-existing condition going back as far as your date of birth, but most insurance companies only look back ten years.
Will it prevent me from obtaining health insurance?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. It will depend upon the condition you have or had, its severity, the cost of medications, and whether the insurance company thinks it will lose money by giving you a policy. Some pre-existing conditions will not exclude you from getting a policy; instead, the insurance company may issue a policy to you, but they might try to offer you the policy with a "rider" which is a clause in your policy that says the insurance company will cover you, but NOT give you coverage for your pre-existing condition. Some companies might offer you their policy with a rider that the company says you may ask them to remove after a certain length of time, such as two years, and other companies may make the rider permanent.
What are some common pre-existing conditions that prevent people from obtaining health insurance?
Alcoholism and drug abuse are usually two conditions that most insurance companies will turn you down for. Others include heart attack or other heart problems within the past five years or so, most companies will not take you if you are diabetic. Many companies will not accept you if you've had certain types of cancer EVER in your life, while other insurance companies won't care if the cancer was more than 20 years in the past. It's almost impossible to get health insurance if you are currently obese or pregnant. Having AIDS is always an automatic decline, as is a stroke in your recent past. Most companies won't care if you have controlled hypertension (high blood pressure) or controlled high cholesterol. But if you have BOTH at the same time, there are very few companies that will offer a policy to you.
What is a group/employer plan?
These types of plans are available to you through your place of employment if your employer offers this benefit. Most employers that offer their employees health insurance make you wait until 30 or 60 or 90 days after you've become employed before you can get on the plan. By state law (and some states may vary), benefits are a little different on group plans than they are on individual plans. For example, most individual plans do not include maternity benefits, but almost all group plans do. Mental health benefits are not usually covered very well on individual plans, but on most group plans, mental health benefits are treated like any other illness. Almost all group plans will cover your pre-existing conditions as soon as you become included on the plan, and with no waiting period. This means that if you have a heart condition and get a job that provides you with health insurance benefits, you could have a heart attack the day you become covered and those medical bills will be covered by the group insurance policy. By law, your employer is required to pay at least 50% of your monthly premium. Some employers may pay all of your premium, but they don't have to. Your employer is not required to pay any of your spouse or children's premium — most companies do not pay any of this amount, but some employers will.
Typically, a deductible is the amount of money you must pay each year before your health insurance plan starts to pay for covered medical expenses. For example, with a $100,000 heart surgery bill, you would be responsible for paying the first $1,000. After this $1,000 deductible is met, the insurance company will pay a percentage of the bill in what is called the coinsurance.
What is coinsurance?
Coinsurance is a cost-sharing requirement where you are responsible for paying a certain percentage and the insurance company will pay the remaining percentage of the covered medical expenses after your deductible is met. For a health insurance plan with 20% coinsurance, once the deductible is met, the insurance company will pay 80% of the covered expenses while you pay the remaining 20% until your out-of-pocket limit is reached for the year. Typically, the out-of-pocket limit is the maximum amount you will pay out of your own pocket for covered medical expenses in a given year. For a plan with a $2,000 out-of-pocket limit, you will pay a $1,000 deductible and $1,000 coinsurance while the insurance company covers the remaining $98,000 of the heart surgery bill. Even if you are hospitalized again in the same year, the insurance company will pay 100% of your covered expenses within the limit of the lifetime maximum.
What are co-pays?
A co-payment or co-pay is a specific flat fee you pay for each medical service, such as $30 for an office visit, after which the insurance company often pays the remainder of the covered medical charges. Let's say you are not feeling well and went to see your doctor who charges $200 for the office visit. If your insurance plan has an office visit co-payment of $30, then you will only be responsible for the $30 and the insurance company will cover the remaining $170.
Do I have to meet my deductible before I see my doctor?
With some health insurance policies the answer is YES, but today, most health insurance plans do NOT require this. Most companies today offer plans wherein the deductible usually only applies while hospitalized or for more major procedures, such as CT scans or MRIs. Most plans today allow you to visit doctors and specialists, and fill prescriptions, with simply a co-pay.
What is "Out-of-Pocket-Maximum?"
This is the amount of money one would pay out of their own pocket towards their medical expenses in any given year. An out of pocket expense can refer to how much the co-payment, coinsurance, or deductible is. Also, when the term annual out-of-pocket maximum is used, that is referring to how much the insured would have to pay for the whole year out of their pocket, excluding premiums. Usually, your maximum out-of-pocket is never more than a couple of thousand dollars over and above your chosen deductible.
What is a network?
A network is a list of doctors, hospitals and other providers that have contracted, or agreed, with an insurance company to do business with the insurance company. The providers fees have been pre-negotiated, which means that the insurance company will not necessarily pay the doctor or hospital what your actual medical bills are, but will pay a lower amount. For example, when you have a gall bladder removed at a hospital, the hospital's charges, if you did not have health insurance, might be $10,000. But under the network pre-negotiated amount, the hospital may only receive $4,000 as payment in full. This saves you and the insurance company money. If you have a health insurance plan that utilizes a network and you use providers that are not part of the network, the amount of money that you would have to pay for those services will be considerably higher than if you had used providers that were in the network. Your insurance company will probably pay some part of those non-network bills, but you'll be paying a whole lot more. Always stay in your network if possible.
What's the difference between a Primary Care Physician (PCP) and a specialist?
A Primary Care Physician, or PCP, is the doctor you would go to on a regular basis, such as when you're simply not feeling well, or have an ear ache or the flu. A specialist is a doctor that your PCP might refer you to if the problem you have requires a doctor with more experience in a certain area. For example, if you contacted your PCP complaining about chest pains, your PCP would most probably refer you to a heart doctor (a cardiologist) who would have more advanced equipment and training to help you.
What is a pre-existing condition?
A pre-existing condition is any health condition you have or have had prior to applying for a policy. For example, if you currently have had kidney stones at any time during your life, then kidney stones would be considered a pre-existing condition. Some insurance companies want to know about your pre-existing condition going back as far as your date of birth, but most insurance companies only look back ten years.
Will it prevent me from obtaining health insurance?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. It will depend upon the condition you have or had, its severity, the cost of medications, and whether the insurance company thinks it will lose money by giving you a policy. Some pre-existing conditions will not exclude you from getting a policy; instead, the insurance company may issue a policy to you, but they might try to offer you the policy with a "rider" which is a clause in your policy that says the insurance company will cover you, but NOT give you coverage for your pre-existing condition. Some companies might offer you their policy with a rider that the company says you may ask them to remove after a certain length of time, such as two years, and other companies may make the rider permanent.
What are some common pre-existing conditions that prevent people from obtaining health insurance?
Alcoholism and drug abuse are usually two conditions that most insurance companies will turn you down for. Others include heart attack or other heart problems within the past five years or so, most companies will not take you if you are diabetic. Many companies will not accept you if you've had certain types of cancer EVER in your life, while other insurance companies won't care if the cancer was more than 20 years in the past. It's almost impossible to get health insurance if you are currently obese or pregnant. Having AIDS is always an automatic decline, as is a stroke in your recent past. Most companies won't care if you have controlled hypertension (high blood pressure) or controlled high cholesterol. But if you have BOTH at the same time, there are very few companies that will offer a policy to you.
What is a group/employer plan?
These types of plans are available to you through your place of employment if your employer offers this benefit. Most employers that offer their employees health insurance make you wait until 30 or 60 or 90 days after you've become employed before you can get on the plan. By state law (and some states may vary), benefits are a little different on group plans than they are on individual plans. For example, most individual plans do not include maternity benefits, but almost all group plans do. Mental health benefits are not usually covered very well on individual plans, but on most group plans, mental health benefits are treated like any other illness. Almost all group plans will cover your pre-existing conditions as soon as you become included on the plan, and with no waiting period. This means that if you have a heart condition and get a job that provides you with health insurance benefits, you could have a heart attack the day you become covered and those medical bills will be covered by the group insurance policy. By law, your employer is required to pay at least 50% of your monthly premium. Some employers may pay all of your premium, but they don't have to. Your employer is not required to pay any of your spouse or children's premium — most companies do not pay any of this amount, but some employers will.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)