Saturday, March 24, 2012

Ezequiel 18. 26-28

"Si el justo se aparta de la justicia para cometer la injusticia y en ella muere, muere por la injusticia que ha cometido. Y si el criminal se aparta de la injusticia que había cometido y practica el derecho y la justicia, salvará su vida. Ha abierto los ojos y se ha convertido de los delitos cometidos, por eso vivirá, no morirá"

Ezequiel 18.24

"Igualmente si el justo se aparta de su justicia, comete la injusticia, según las acciones detestables cometidas por el criminal, ¿podrá vivir? No se recordará nada de toda la justicia que había practicado. Por la infedilidad y el delito que ha cometido morirá"

Friday, March 23, 2012

La esposa musulmana. Libertad Digital.


Ser musulmán es muy sacrificado. Tienes que hacer las abluciones y tirarte al suelo con el culo en pompa para la oración. Pobre de ti si al tío que se postra delante le cantan los pies o tiene flatulencia. Luego está lo del Ramadán, que para el hipotenso es una gaita, y lo de la peregrinación a La Meca, que resulta muy estresante.
Por otra parte, los esparcimientos mahometanos son un poco sosos porque el islam no ve con buenos ojos la música, ni el baile, ni las representaciones teatrales ni el arte con figuras humanas. Tampoco permite el vino; ni el jamón, porque el cerdo es un animal impuro. Yo aquí debo hacer un inciso para defender al cerdo y decir que no hay un solo animal que sea puro. Sin ir más lejos, un humano limpio carga con más de dos kilos de microbios por dentro y por fuera, y además tenemos que estarles agradecidos porque nos hacen diversos trabajos por el cuerpo.
Pero, señores míos, si duro es ser musulmán, peor es ser musulmana, porque el islam es una religión de hombres y para hombres. A la sensibilidad occidental le escandalizan los casos como el de la morita que se suicidó porque el violador con el que la casaron la maltrataba. Quizá lo que más molesta es que los culpables se vayan de rositas, como este viudo que ahora dice que él sólo le teme a Alá. Pues por ese lado yo creo que no tiene nada que temer.
A veces, la gente piensa que la discriminación y la violencia contra las mujeres entre los musulmanes no están relacionadas con su religión. Pero a mí me parece que sí. El Corán dice, por ejemplo: "Los hombres tienen autoridad sobre las mujeres porque Dios los ha hecho superiores a ellas" (4:34). Eso ya es mala cosa.
Pero, claro, al fin y al cabo, Mahoma veía a las mujeres sólo como campos de cultivo. "Vuestras mujeres son vuestro campo de cultivo; id pues a vuestro campo de cultivo como queráis" (Corán 2:223). Desde luego, no es nada sexy montártelo con tu señora convencido de que es un campo de cultivo, pero es que los musulmanes, bajo nuestro punto de vista, son un estuche de rarezas; no les importa pensar en su mujer como un terrenito, aunque, eso sí, que no les quiten las huríes del Paraíso, unas "voluptuosas mujeres afines en todo", "de hermosísimos ojos", "como rubíes y corales", "a las que ningún hombre o ser visible ha tocado". Son ganas de marear la perdiz. Las verdaderas huríes están ahí, debajo de esos velos negros.
El Corán describe el Paraíso como un lugar destinado a suministrar todos los placeres materiales que puede apetecer un varón desértico: muchos arroyuelos, muchas bebidas y muchas comidas, aunque el vino no emborracha y la carne es de ave. Todo servido en oro y plata por huríes. El Paraíso no está pensado para las mujeres porque Mahoma diseñó una religión al gusto masculino, para que sus guerreros dieran caña al infiel. Y, ojo, lo consiguió, porque la caña que nos dieron no es ninguna coña
El Paraíso está garantizado sólo a aquellos que "matan y son muertos" por la causa de Alá. Da escalofríos pensar que el más famoso de los secuestradores del 11 de Septiembre, Mohamed Atta, que además de asesino fanático debía de ser cerril, llevaba en su maleta un traje de boda para desposarse en el Paraíso. Pues se lució, porque, con sus partes pulverizadas, le habrá sido complicado consumar los desposorios.
Con el Corán en la mano es imposible pensar en la igualdad de los sexos, porque menosprecia y desacredita a las mujeres. Por ejemplo, ordena que la herencia de un hijo sea el doble que la de una hija. "Al varón le corresponde la porción de dos hembras". (4:11). Y declara que el testimonio de una mujer vale la mitad que el de un hombre. "Llamad a dos hombres para que sirvan de testigos, y si no encontráis dos hombres, entonces, un hombre y dos mujeres que os parezcan aceptables como testigos, de modo que si una yerra, la otra subsane su error" (2:82).
Y anima a los maridos a que peguen a sus esposas desobedientes (4:34):
Las mujeres virtuosas son las verdaderamente devotas que guardan la intimidad que Alá les ha ordenado que guarden. Pero a aquellas cuya animadversión temáis, amonestadlas y luego dejadlas solas en el lecho: luego pegadles.
Así que no es nada extraño que el imán de Tarrasa se pusiera a malmeter animando a los fieles a "corregir con actos de violencia física y psíquica las conductas desviadas de sus mujeres" y a dar consejos concretos de cómo golpearlas y aislarlas en el domicilio conyugal y, lo más cachondo, "negarles las relaciones sexuales".
Aunque ninguna mujer debería tener hijos antes de los veinte años, el islam fomenta el matrimonio infantil y eso hace más vulnerables a las esposas. El famoso ayatolá Jomeini, que era un tío muy inspirado, decía que casarse con una niña, antes de que empiece a menstruar, es una bendición divina (no dice si para la niña es también una bendición), y aconsejaba a los padres que hicieran todo lo posible para que sus hijas no vieran su primer sangrado en la casa paterna. Así pasa lo que pasa.
Más de la mitad de las adolescentes de Afganistán y Bangladesh están casadas. En Egipto, el 29% de las adolescentes casadas han sido golpeadas por sus maridos, y de ellas el 41% recibieron palizas mientras estaban embarazadas. En Jordania, el 26% de los casos de violencia doméstica se cometieron contra esposas menores de 18 años.
Según un informe hecho público por el ex primer ministro británico Gordon Brown, 25.000 menores son obligadas a contraer matrimonio cada día en un conjunto de 16 países de África y Asia; unos nueve millones al año.
El mismo Mahoma, que tuvo, al menos, nueve esposas y multitud de concubinas, se casó con Aisha cuando ésta tenía seis años, y consumó el matrimonio cuando ella tenía nueve. Y a pesar de que fue su esposa más amada, por si no lo sabíais, la maltrataba. Por ejemplo, una noche, creyendo que Aisha estaba dormida, Mahoma se largó. Ella se atrevió a espiarlo y él, muy cabreado, le pegó una paliza, causándole mucho dolor en el pecho. Luego fue y le dijo: "¿Acaso pensaste que Alá y su Apóstol iban a actuar de modo injusto contigo?".
Yo no quiero meterme con los musulmanes porque todavía están muy picados con aquello de las Cruzadas y son tan suspicaces que te pones un cruzado mágico y les dan ganas de tomar Jerusalén. Pero si estuviera casada con un maltratador, me defendería. Se me dan bien las latas de conserva caducadas, las setas venenosas y los huevos estrellados. En mis manos, la minipimer es un arma homicida, y también soy buena con el mal de ojo. Pues mira, ahora mismo, aunque los ulemas me hagan una fatua, le voy a lanzar un conjuro, como la copa de un pino, al viudo de la pobre morita muerta. Prepárate para la orquitis, violador, tus pelotas tienen los días contados.

"Emily's Rain" - Peter Bradley Adams

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

A Silicon Valley School That Doesn’t Compute


LOS ALTOS, Calif. — The chief technology officer of eBay sends his children to a nine-classroom school here. So do employees of Silicon Valley giants like Google, Apple, Yahoo and Hewlett-Packard.

Grading the Digital School

Blackboards, Not Laptops
Articles in this series are looking at the intersection of education, technology and business as schools embrace digital learning.
Multimedia
Jim Wilson/The New York Times
Cathy Waheed helps Shira Zeev, a fifth grader. Waldorf parents are happy to delay their children's engagement with technology. More Photos »

Readers’ Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
But the school’s chief teaching tools are anything but high-tech: pens and paper, knitting needles and, occasionally, mud. Not a computer to be found. No screens at all. They are not allowed in the classroom, and the school even frowns on their use at home.
Schools nationwide have rushed to supply their classrooms with computers, and many policy makers say it is foolish to do otherwise. But the contrarian point of view can be found at the epicenter of the tech economy, where some parents and educators have a message: computers and schools don’t mix.
This is the Waldorf School of the Peninsula, one of around 160 Waldorf schools in the country that subscribe to a teaching philosophy focused on physical activity and learning through creative, hands-on tasks. Those who endorse this approach say computers inhibit creative thinking, movement, human interaction and attention spans.
The Waldorf method is nearly a century old, but its foothold here among the digerati puts into sharp relief anintensifying debate about the role of computers in education.
“I fundamentally reject the notion you need technology aids in grammar school,” said Alan Eagle, 50, whose daughter, Andie, is one of the 196 children at the Waldorf elementary school; his son William, 13, is at the nearby middle school. “The idea that an app on an iPad can better teach my kids to read or do arithmetic, that’s ridiculous.”
Mr. Eagle knows a bit about technology. He holds a computer science degree from Dartmouth and works in executive communications at Google, where he has written speeches for the chairman, Eric E. Schmidt. He uses an iPad and a smartphone. But he says his daughter, a fifth grader, “doesn’t know how to use Google,” and his son is just learning. (Starting in eighth grade, the school endorses the limited use of gadgets.)
Three-quarters of the students here have parents with a strong high-tech connection. Mr. Eagle, like other parents, sees no contradiction. Technology, he says, has its time and place: “If I worked at Miramax and made good, artsy, rated R movies, I wouldn’t want my kids to see them until they were 17.”
While other schools in the region brag about their wired classrooms, the Waldorf school embraces a simple, retro look — blackboards with colorful chalk, bookshelves with encyclopedias, wooden desks filled with workbooks and No. 2 pencils.
On a recent Tuesday, Andie Eagle and her fifth-grade classmates refreshed their knitting skills, crisscrossing wooden needles around balls of yarn, making fabric swatches. It’s an activity the school says helps develop problem-solving, patterning, math skills and coordination. The long-term goal: make socks.
Down the hall, a teacher drilled third-graders on multiplication by asking them to pretend to turn their bodies into lightning bolts. She asked them a math problem — four times five — and, in unison, they shouted “20” and zapped their fingers at the number on the blackboard. A roomful of human calculators.
In second grade, students standing in a circle learned language skills by repeating verses after the teacher, while simultaneously playing catch with bean bags. It’s an exercise aimed at synchronizing body and brain. Here, as in other classes, the day can start with a recitation or verse about God that reflects a nondenominational emphasis on the divine.
Andie’s teacher, Cathy Waheed, who is a former computer engineer, tries to make learning both irresistible and highly tactile. Last year she taught fractions by having the children cut up food — apples, quesadillas, cake — into quarters, halves and sixteenths.
“For three weeks, we ate our way through fractions,” she said. “When I made enough fractional pieces of cake to feed everyone, do you think I had their attention?”
Some education experts say that the push to equip classrooms with computers is unwarranted because studies do not clearly show that this leads to better test scores or other measurable gains.
Is learning through cake fractions and knitting any better? The Waldorf advocates make it tough to compare, partly because as private schools they administer no standardized tests in elementary grades. And they would be the first to admit that their early-grade students may not score well on such tests because, they say, they don’t drill them on a standardized math and reading curriculum.
When asked for evidence of the schools’ effectiveness, the Association of Waldorf Schoolsof North America points to research by an affiliated group showing that 94 percent of students graduating from Waldorf high schools in the United States between 1994 and 2004 attended college, with many heading to prestigious institutions like Oberlin, Berkeley and Vassar.
Of course, that figure may not be surprising, given that these are students from families that value education highly enough to seek out a selective private school, and usually have the means to pay for it. And it is difficult to separate the effects of the low-tech instructional methods from other factors. For example, parents of students at the Los Altos school say it attracts great teachers who go through extensive training in the Waldorf approach, creating a strong sense of mission that can be lacking in other schools.
Absent clear evidence, the debate comes down to subjectivity, parental choice and a difference of opinion over a single world: engagement. Advocates for equipping schools with technology say computers can hold students’ attention and, in fact, that young people who have been weaned on electronic devices will not tune in without them.
Ann Flynn, director of education technology for the National School Boards Association, which represents school boards nationwide, said computers were essential. “If schools have access to the tools and can afford them, but are not using the tools, they are cheating our children,” Ms. Flynn said.
Paul Thomas, a former teacher and an associate professor of education at Furman University, who has written 12 books about public educational methods, disagreed, saying that “a spare approach to technology in the classroom will always benefit learning.”
“Teaching is a human experience,” he said. “Technology is a distraction when we need literacy, numeracy and critical thinking.”
And Waldorf parents argue that real engagement comes from great teachers with interesting lesson plans.
“Engagement is about human contact, the contact with the teacher, the contact with their peers,” said Pierre Laurent, 50, who works at a high-tech start-up and formerly worked at Intel and Microsoft. He has three children in Waldorf schools, which so impressed the family that his wife, Monica, joined one as a teacher in 2006.
And where advocates for stocking classrooms with technology say children need computer time to compete in the modern world, Waldorf parents counter: what’s the rush, given how easy it is to pick up those skills?
“It’s supereasy. It’s like learning to use toothpaste,” Mr. Eagle said. “At Google and all these places, we make technology as brain-dead easy to use as possible. There’s no reason why kids can’t figure it out when they get older.”
There are also plenty of high-tech parents at a Waldorf school in San Francisco and just north of it at the Greenwood School in Mill Valley, which doesn’t have Waldorf accreditation but is inspired by its principles.
California has some 40 Waldorf schools, giving it a disproportionate share — perhaps because the movement is growing roots here, said Lucy Wurtz, who, along with her husband, Brad, helped found the Waldorf high school in Los Altos in 2007. Mr. Wurtz is chief executive of Power Assure, which helps computer data centers reduce their energy load.
The Waldorf experience does not come cheap: annual tuition at the Silicon Valley schools is $17,750 for kindergarten through eighth grade and $24,400 for high school, though Ms. Wurtz said financial assistance was available. She says the typical Waldorf parent, who has a range of elite private and public schools to choose from, tends to be liberal and highly educated, with strong views about education; they also have a knowledge that when they are ready to teach their children about technology they have ample access and expertise at home.
The students, meanwhile, say they don’t pine for technology, nor have they gone completely cold turkey. Andie Eagle and her fifth-grade classmates say they occasionally watch movies. One girl, whose father works as an Apple engineer, says he sometimes asks her to test games he is debugging. One boy plays with flight-simulator programs on weekends.
The students say they can become frustrated when their parents and relatives get so wrapped up in phones and other devices. Aurad Kamkar, 11, said he recently went to visit cousins and found himself sitting around with five of them playing with their gadgets, not paying attention to him or each other. He started waving his arms at them: “I said: ‘Hello guys, I’m here.’ ”
Finn Heilig, 10, whose father works at Google, says he liked learning with pen and paper — rather than on a computer — because he could monitor his progress over the years.
“You can look back and see how sloppy your handwriting was in first grade. You can’t do that with computers ’cause all the letters are the same,” Finn said. “Besides, if you learn to write on paper, you can still write if water spills on the computer or the power goes out.”

Friday, March 16, 2012

Florence and the Machine - Leave my body lyrics

Kathleen Edwards - Chameleon Comedian



I know your heart
It is a sacred thing
And you're a comedian
You hide behind your funny face
Every time, every time

Out of the shadows
Out of the cameras and the lights
You're a chameleon
And you hide behind your darker side

Every time, every time
I don't need a punchline
Don't need a punchline

Everybody's watching
The way that I see you could not change
I'll be your medium
For everything you wanted to say
'Cause out of the shadows
Out of the cameras and the lights
I'm a chameleon
I just hide behind the songs I write

See me smile
It's not for a funny joke

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

About the Fortune by Maquiavelli


IT is not unknown to me how many men have had, and still have, the opinion that the affairs of the world are in such wise governed by fortune and by God that men with their wisdom cannot direct them and that no one can even help them; and because of this they would have us believe that it is not necessary to labour much in affairs, but to let chance govern them. This opinion has been more credited in our times because of the great changes in affairs which have been seen, and may still be seen, every day, beyond all human conjecture. Sometimes pondering over this, I am in some degree inclined to their opinion. Nevertheless, not to extinguish our free will, I hold it to be true that Fortune is the arbiter of one-half of our actions, but that she still leaves us to direct the other half, or perhaps a little less.
I compare her to one of those raging rivers, which when in flood overflows the plains, sweeping away trees and buildings, bearing away the soil from place to place; everything flies before it, all yield to its violence, without being able in any way to withstand it; and yet, though its nature be such, it does not follow therefore that men, when the weather becomes fair, shall not make provision, both with defences and barriers, in such a manner that, rising again, the waters may pass away by canal, and their force be neither so unrestrained nor so dangerous. So it happens with fortune, who shows her power where valour has not prepared to resist her, and thither she turns her forces where she knows that barriers and defences have not been raised to constrain her.
And if you will consider Italy, which is the seat of these changes, and which has given to them their impulse, you will see it to be an open country without barriers and without any defence. For if it had been defended by proper valour, as are Germany, Spain, and France, either this invasion would not have made the great changes it has made or it would not have come at all. And this I consider enough to say concerning resistance to fortune in general.
But confining myself more to the particular, I say that a prince may be seen happy to-day and ruined to-morrow without having shown any change of disposition or character. This, I believe, arises firstly from causes that have already been discussed at length, namely, that the prince who relies entirely upon fortune is lost when it changes. I believe also that he will be successful who directs his actions according to the spirit of the times, and that he whose actions do not accord with the times will not be successful. Because men are seen, in affairs that lead to the end which every man has before him, namely, glory and riches, to get there by various methods; one with caution, another with haste; one by force, another by skill; one by patience, another by its opposite; and each one succeeds in reaching the goal by a different method. One can also see of two cautious men the one attain his end, the other fail; and similarly, two men by different observances are equally successful, the one being cautious, the other impetuous; all this arises from nothing else than whether or not they conform in their methods to the spirit of the times. This follows from what I have said, that two men working differently bring about the same effect, and of two working similarly, one attains his object and the other does not.
Changes in estate also issue from this, for if, to one who governs himself with caution and patience, times and affairs converge in such a way that his administration is successful, his fortune is made; but if times and affairs change, he is ruined if he does not change his course of action. But a man is not often found sufficiently circumspect to know how to accommodate himself to the change, both because he cannot deviate from what nature inclines him to, and also because, having always prospered by acting in one way, he cannot be persuaded that it is well to leave it; and, therefore, the cautious man, when it is time to turn adventurous, does not know how to do it, hence he is ruined; but had he changed his conduct with the times fortune would not have changed.
Pope Julius II went to work impetuously in all his affairs, and found the times and circumstances conform so well to that line of action that he always met with success. Consider his first enterprise against Bologna, Messer Giovanni Bentivogli being still alive. The Venetians were not agreeable to it, nor was the King of Spain, and he had the enterprise still under discussion with the King of France; nevertheless he personally entered upon the expedition with his accustomed boldness and energy, a move which made Spain and the Venetians stand irresolute and passive, the latter from fear, the former from desire to recover all the kingdom of Naples; on the other hand, he drew after him the King of France, because that king, having observed the movement, and desiring to make the Pope his friend so as to humble the Venetians, found it impossible to refuse him soldiers without manifestly offending him. Therefore Julius with his impetuous action accomplished what no other pontiff with simple human wisdom could have done; for if he had waited in Rome until he could get away, with his plans arranged and everything fixed, as any other pontiff would have done, he would never have succeeded. Because the King of France would have made a thousand excuses, and the others would have raised a thousand fears.
I will leave his other actions alone, as they were all alike, and they all succeeded, for the shortness of his life did not let him experience the contrary; but if circumstances had arisen which required him to go cautiously, his ruin would have followed, because he would never have deviated from those ways to which nature inclined him.
I conclude therefore that, fortune being changeful and mankind steadfast in their ways, so long as the two are in agreement men are successful, but unsuccessful when they fall out. For my part I consider that it is better to be adventurous than cautious, because fortune is a woman, and if you wish to keep her under it is necessary to beat and ill-use her; and it is seen that she allows herself to be mastered by the adventurous rather than by those who go to work more coldly. She is, therefore, always, woman-like, a lover of young men, because they are less cautious, more violent, and with more audacity command her.

Monday, March 5, 2012

3on3 Hoop it up

http://www.hoopitup.com/tournaments.aspx?section_id=2

2012 Hoop It Up Indianapolis! - June 30-July 1


Location

Indiana State Fairgounds Mid-Way Lot

Indianapolis, IN Tournament Date

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Sunday, July 01, 2012